Estrogen-only Therapy Less Risky Than First Thought [latimes.com]

A new analysis from the Women’s Health Initiative finds that the risk of stroke from estrogen-only therapy for menopausal symptoms fades with time.

By Shari Roan, Los Angeles Times

Although many women have sworn off hormone therapy, a new analysis from the clinical trial that first unearthed the hormones’ risks shows taking estrogen alone for menopausalsymptoms, even for several years, may be safer than first thought.

The new finding — the latest from the Women’s HealthInitiative, a federally funded trial that tracked thousands of women taking hormones or placebo pills for years — looked at women who have had hysterectomies and thus can take estrogen unaccompanied by another hormone, progestin. (Women with a uterustake progestin to protect against uterine cancer.) It found that a heightened risk of stroke from taking estrogen faded with time, while a reduced risk of breast cancer held steady.

That news, published Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Assn., may weaken — for this group of women — the current recommendation from doctors that hormones to treat hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms should be taken in the smallest doses possible for the shortest amount of time.

“This study is very good news for women without a uterus,” said Andrea LaCroix, the lead author of the study and an epidemiologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

The so-called estrogen-only arm of the Women’s Health Initiative, which began with more than 10,000 women ages 50 to 79 who’d had hysterectomies, was halted prematurely in 2004 after researchers discovered that the risk of stroke was slightly higher — 12 more cases among 10,000 people in women who had taken estrogen for an average of six years compared with those who received placebo pills. At the same time, the hormone failed to reduce the risk of heart disease, which had been the principal hope of the study.

LaCroix and her colleagues examined data from 7,645 of the participants more than four years after they had stopped therapy. The scientists found that a slightly higher risk of blood clots in the legs, corresponding to six additional cases per 10,000 women, vanished along with the increased risk of stroke. So too did a benefit: A small decreased risk of hip fracture seen during the intervention — six fewer hip fractures per 10,000 women — returned to baseline after the women stopped taking estrogen.

“What’s very interesting is the fact that the reduction of breast cancer in this particular group persisted while all the other risks and benefits disappeared,” said Dr. Margery Gass, executive director of the North American Menopause Society and a consultant at the Cleveland Clinic, who was not involved in this particular Women’s Health Initiative report. “It’s very hard to explain.”

Estrogen is thought to promote breast cancer in some women by stimulating cell growth and inhibiting the natural suicide of cells, a process called apoptosis. Other research, however, has hinted that a period of years with no hormones — such as natural menopause — followed by a period of hormone exposure produces anti-cancer effects.

“In these circumstances, estrogen acts like it stimulates apoptosis,” said Dr. Rowan T. Chlebowski, a medical oncologist at the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute and a coauthor of the study. By so doing, it could cause precancerous cells in the breast to self-destruct before they cause problems. He called the finding on breast cancer risk reduction “definitive.”

Click to read the rest of the article

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s