Sadly, I read about a new study in the science journal Violence and Gender, titled “Denying Rape but Endorsing Forceful Intercourse: Exploring Differences Among Responders”, where one third of male responders in the study would rape a woman if there were no consequences.
Quoting from The Independent:
“Amongst other questions they were asked how they would act in a situation where they could have sexual intercourse with a woman against her will “if nobody would ever know and there wouldn’t be any consequences”.
31.7% of all men participating in the study would force a woman to have sexual intercourse in such a “consequence-free situation” – which is rape.
Worryingly, most men who indicated that they would commit rape did not even recognise their actions as such.
When explicitly asked whether they would rape a woman if there were no consequences, only 13.6% of participants said they would do so, a marked fall on those who had described that they would commit rape.”
For some reason, the male respondents, when the action was made clear that what would be happening was legally defined as rape, lowered the percentage saying they would still rape a woman.
There seems to be a disconnect among the male respondents about what IS rape. And somehow this disconnect seems to maintain that it is NOT rape if it is a consequence-free situation.
It appears there is still lots of work to do with education and ethics for university college males.
Link to the study: http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/vio.2014.0022